LOST in transition[ sic! ]

April 1, 2008

With my basic knowledge of the chiasmus (i.e. no knowing at all) I’ve already summarized the three main pillars on which the series ’Lost’ is based. After reading Donald Kunze’s summary on labyrinths, (’the labyrinth and its sorrows’) I found the term chiasmus, which is:

…nearly ubiquitous wherever surprises and suspense are required.’

The three main parts – concerning ’Time’ or Time structures – are the following:

Theory                                                                                  in ’Lost’

1, the venatic (main action line)                                        happenings on the island, involving the marks of Uncanniness and                                                                                                    mysteries

2, forensic (the sub-plot’s backwards form of time)     the pasts of the characters

3, festal (action and/or chase scenes)                              all the adventurous elements



One Response to “LOST in transition[ sic! ]”

  1. […] Posted in Uncategorized by kelemenzsolt on the May 3, 2008 In one of my previous posts, I dealt with the possible structure of the series, ‘Lost’. Well, to my surprise, Mr […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: